AH Email me

An independent study · 22 sci-fi releases

Does an earlier first trailer mean a bigger opening weekend? I tested it on 22 science fiction releases from 2024 to 2026.

Role
Question, data collection, analysis
Status
Independent study, October 2026
Data
Trailer Math, The Numbers, Saturation.io
Sample
22 US wide releases with a reported budget

My own study, built from public box office data. Not a studio project.

Chart: each of 22 sci-fi releases plotted by days between its first trailer and opening, against its US opening weekend. Franchise films sit high and to the right; originals sit low and to the left.

The question

I went into this study believing that starting a campaign earlier leads to a bigger opening.

Trailer Math already records when every studio trailer lands. So I paired those lead times with opening weekends to see whether an early start pays off.

How I set it up

A raw comparison would mislead, because the films that start earliest are also the biggest: tentpoles with large budgets and existing fans. So I compared like with like.

  • One genre: science fiction, US releases from January 2024 to October 2026. Starting in 2024 leaves out the pandemic years, when theaters were closed and many films opened on streaming the same day.
  • Three types of film: franchise (sequels, reboots and spin-offs, all marketed to an existing fanbase), adaptation (books and remakes, with a smaller built-in audience), and original.
  • Wide releases with a reported budget: films that reached 600 or more theaters. Seven smaller films were dropped and kept on record.
  • Opening weekend, not lifetime gross: the opening is what a campaign is judged on. After it, reviews and word of mouth take over.

I collected each opening, theater count and budget by hand from The Numbers and Saturation.io, with a source for every figure.

What I found

Each group split in half by lead time, with typical (median) values:

GroupEarliest-starting halfLatest-starting half
All 22 films$80.5M opening · $190M budget$4.0M opening · $50M budget
Franchise (9)$70.5M opening · $205M budget$90.6M opening · $203M budget
Original (8)$12.5M opening · $98M budget$3.4M opening · $18M budget
Adaptation (5)$49.8M opening · $159M budget$6.2M opening · $35M budget

Across all 22 films, the early starters opened about 20 times bigger. But they also cost almost four times as much. Among franchise films, where budgets match, the early half opened smaller, and the latest-starting franchise film, Spider-Man: Brand New Day, had the biggest opening of the study.

Measured as opening weekend per dollar of budget, originals earned about the same whether they started early or late (0.17 against 0.18), and so did adaptations (0.28 against 0.30).

Why

Budget and brand drive both things at once. A studio starts a tentpole's campaign early because it can afford to, and the film opens big because it has a budget and a fanbase behind it. Compared across all films, lead time takes the credit for both.

Big-budget films start early because they can afford to. They aren't big because they started early.

What it means for a campaign

For a small or mid-budget film, copying a tentpole's long runway buys nothing in this data. Since audiences forget, the smarter bet is probably to save that money for a shorter, sharper push closer to opening. That last part is my judgment, not something this study measured.

Limits

  • The groups are small, four to five films a side, so this shows no sign of an effect rather than proving there is none.
  • One film moves the franchise result: Spider-Man: Brand New Day opened to $360M.
  • Bugonia's opening weekend is a 17-theater platform launch, marked with an asterisk on the chart.
  • Budgets are reported estimates, and Dune: Part Two's 304-day lead includes the 2023 strike delay.

Open to Summer 2027 internships

Hiring a marketing intern? Write to me.

Arcata, California. In Los Angeles for Summer 2027.